How is EFEI used?
elementary variety The EFEI is scored using a simple, reliable system. Each feature on the EFEI list is designed to be easily quantifiable so that this is possible. The assessor simply marks the item as 'present' or 'not present', and, for rare ambiguous cases 'somewhat present'. A total score is generated that allows different schools to be compared with each other; however the most important feature of the EFEI is its ability to help pinpoint specific areas where change is needed.

Customisation

The EFEI can be tailored for the needs of each different community. Defining EFEI allows for local environmental and cultural differences and aspirations to be respected and supported.

With the EFEI, it is possible to assess the appropriateness of existing school buildings for providing 21st century education. In addition, it automates assessment of architectural and interior design plans for new schools, thus providing an extra tool for clients to use in assessing school building plans. It can also be considered as an appendix to design briefs for new school developments.

EFEI is a powerful tool because it facilitates dialogue between designers and the school community, enabling users to engage meaningfully over specific design features. It helps school communities to identify and protect design features that support their educational philosophy.

EFEI can also be combined very effectively with existing and new GIS systems to provide “big-picture” cost-benefit analyses of educational facilities spending decisions.

Has EFEI Influenced Government Funding Decisions?

In almost every instance of its use, EFEI has informed government funding decisions. This has happened in several ways. 1) The EFEI review has provided an objective assessment of a particular school's educational effectiveness and thus helped determine its eligibility for funding; 2) The EFEI review specifically identified the areas in which the physical campus was deficient from a teaching and learning standpoint and helped focus spending on those aspects of the school's building and campus that would directly benefit its educational mission; 3) The EFEI review allowed the government to prioritize scarce capital dollars in situations with competing priorities by allowing decision-makers to assess the “educational bang for the buck” of spending decisions and allocate funds accordingly; 4) For already funded projects, EFEI is providing a common framework that all stakeholders can use to determine the most effective way in which those monies should be spent to achieve the desired educational objectives; 5) For projects that have been recently completed, EFEI is providing a common vocabulary to gauge how well the campus is meeting its educational mission while providing low-cost or no-cost options to optimize its value from a teaching, learning and community use standpoint.